Talk:Roman Josi/GA1

GA Review

Passed. 123Writer ^talk 15:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1TWO3Writer (talk · contribs) 11:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Part of August 2023 backlog. Good luck.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Huge paragraphs. I suggest creating subheadings for each season so breaking those paragraphs down will not ruin the flow of the article.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead should be expanded with info about international career and possibly his personal life. Some words like "disappointing", "outstanding", etc. are used; I've deleted what I could find, look out for other words to watch.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	CS1. No issues.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See below
	2c. it contains no original research.	Every statement seems backed by a citation.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Statistics Earwig false positive. No issues.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Is there anything notable that happened since March?
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issues.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	See 1b.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No editwarring. Just general fixes recently.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All own work by Wikipedians, shared on Commons.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All photos of the subject in relevant sections.
	7. Overall assessment.

Spot-check

1, 12, 16, 25, 39, 48, 54, 69, 73, 87, 92, 101, 116, 123, 139, 142, 158, 168

(48) Is 26:22 in minutes? Hours?
- Minutes. Fixed in article. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Thanks for the review 1TWO3Writer! Since the Preds did not make the 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs, nothing really has happened since the season ended. However, I will add a couple sentences about how he finished (ie. pts). I will also add refs in the refs section of the awards table. I will also work on expanding/tweaking the lead.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, my main issue really though is the big paragraphs, so if you also work on that with all other improvements that'd be great! 123Writer ^talk 15:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4 Pinging just in case. 123Writer ^talk 15:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1TWO3Writer, will do! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4 I've taken the liberty to break down the paragraphs for you. Are you happy with those changes? 123Writer ^talk 13:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1TWO3Writer, yes thank you! I'm still not happy with the lead and I realized the international section also needs some work. Is there anything else you have come across? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, not at least from a quick re-read. I'll pass the article but feel free to make any further improvements. Good job. 123Writer ^talk 15:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.