Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Clifton

Catholicism Low‑importance

Roman Catholic Diocese of Clifton is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gloucestershire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bristol Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article situation

From Matt-rex. Agree, but the other one should be removed as out of date.

Hi there, Matt-rex. First of all, to start a new discussion on a talk page, click the plus sign. After you've written what you want to say, sign it with four tildes (~~~~). For more information, see Help:Talk page. As for the articles, there is no need to delete anything in this case. If the article Diocese of Clifton were deleted, then whenever someone typed in "Diocese of Clifton" in the search box, they would get a message saying that no article by that name was found, and an invitation to create one. That's not what we want. Instead, the text of Diocese of Clifton should be replaced with #redirect [[Clifton Diocese]], which creates a redirect to this article. That way, when people type in "Diocese of Clifton", they'll end up here. —Keenan Pepper 20:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's great - thank you Keenan Pepper, much appreciated. Still new here to the editing side, so learning the etiquette and correct methods. Diocese of Clifton is out of date, so should be redirected to the correct up-to-date version: Clifton Diocese. Thanks. User:Matt-rex 09:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger & transfer

I have two suggestions to make about this article:

1) the separate article entitled Bishop of Clifton should be merged into this article; it would be natural to include a list of bishops in an article about the diocese; and

2) the section about the current incumbent bishop is biographical in nature and not relevant to an article about the diocese; it should be removed to a new article about the man.

Views?

(Bengeo Bertie (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

In most other cases ther is a separate article for Bishop of and Dicoese of - the list can get pretty long after all. Yes a separate article realy should be created for the current incumbent - there seems to be reasonable agreement that a Diocesan Bishop of the major episcopal churches is ex officio notable - it would however require sourcing. David Underdown (talk) 13:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Diocese of Clifton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150711022547/http://archive.cliftondiocese.com/deanery-and-parish-directory to http://archive.cliftondiocese.com/deanery-and-parish-directory

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]