Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago/GA1

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

Lead

The demographic figures given in the third paragraph don't match what the source provided says.

The image immediately underneath the infobox says "As announced in 2006, the former Archbishop Quigley Preparatory Seminary on Chestnut Street will be the Pastoral Center, headquarters of the archdiocese." We're now in 2009, hasn't this happened yet?

Our Lady of the Angels fire

Needs to be cited.

Archbishop's Residence

The first paragraph is uncited.

There has been a request for citation in place since February 2007.

Departments

The long list needs to be focused on the important departments and converted to prose.

Office of Catholic Schools

The first paragraph needs to be cited.

References

There are at least 4 dead links.

Publisher and last accessdates should be included for all citations.

--Malleus Fatuorum 18:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Majoreditor. One other concern. The lead isn't really an encapsulation as it appears to contain details which aren't covered in the body of the article. Majoreditor (talk) 21:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As these issues remain outstanding, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum 22:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.