Talk:Roma-class ironclad/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 09:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Will review over the weekend. Miyagawa (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Images licenses are fine.
- No DAB links.
- References are all good.
- Link through to Venezia when it first appears in the article proper in the last sentence of Design. It's linked elsewhere but this is the first time it occurs in the actual text of the article.
- Likewise Roma in the second sentence of General characteristics and machinery.
- @Parsecboy: Other than that, I can't fault the article. Nice work. Miyagawa (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Both linked, thanks for another review, Miyagawa! Parsecboy (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- No worries, happy to pass. Miyagawa (talk) 20:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Both linked, thanks for another review, Miyagawa! Parsecboy (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)