Talk:Rolls-Royce Phantom VI

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The latest Phantom is to tiny to be called Silver Phantom VII. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.252.11.10 (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

6,750 cc vs. 6,750 cc

Quote: "In a 1979 upgrade the engine capacity was increased to 6,750 cc (412 cu in), a 3-speed automatic gearbox with torque converter was substituted, and separate front and rear air conditioning units were provided.[1] Inclusion of the engine from the Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit in 1982 increased engine displacement once more, to 6,750 cc." How is that an increase in displacement? It seems to be the same before and after! --Stizzleswick (talk) 04:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so bad

Can we not do better than this?--Akrasia25 (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me Understand

"A Rolls Royce Phantom VI with the chassis table PRH 4574 was delivered in 1969 to W.A. Shapland, Chairman of Hunsbury Machinery, Ltd. in Great Britain. Mrs. Adnan M. Khashoggi’s flamboyant husband also gave her a Rolls Phantom VI with the chassis PRH 4567 in August 1969 and it was delivered in Great Britain."

That was rejected for being promotional, and it's a reference from a book with a valid isbn #. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kushmania (talk • contribs) 13:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These essays and policies might help explain why every car can not be included in an article about the car. The essays are meant to be humorous so please do not take offense but they are based on a lot of agreed WP policy. The funniest one is WP:GARAGE. Also look at Wikipedia:Relevance and the longest one is Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Again, love your passion and I hope that you continue as an editor. There are things to learn in WP but it is a great relaxing hobby. PS. Please sign your entries.--Akrasia25 (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]