Talk:Rolando Del Maestro

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 21:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Rolando Del Maestro

• ... that Rolando Del Maestro (pictured) used flight simulation to teach surgeons how to perform brain surgery? Rolando saw an opportunity for rapid improvement by incorporating simulation into neurosurgical training using the aviation industry’s current practices as a model. [1]
  • ALT1:... that Rolando Del Maestro (pictured) used the principles of flight simulation to measure how well surgeons perform brain surgery? the study involved Del Maestro...introduces a virtual setting of surgical operation that can be used to accurately assess a surgeon’s performance level[2]

• Reviewed: Cirsium eriophorum

5x expanded by Whispyhistory (talk), Lebsci (talk), and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 22:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC).

• Comment In a somewhat kamikaze move, User:Philafrenzy has stuck a "clarify" tag on the lead. Better fix that! Johnbod (talk) 01:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

• You don't think "where he has been involved in using virtual reality and artificial intelligence technology with traditional medical school teaching methods and flight simulation to focus research on a neurosurgical training simulator, which allows neurosurgeons to practice brain surgery" needs clarification? (I didn't write that bit) Philafrenzy (talk) 07:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

• Actually I thought that bit just about ok for the lead, but the bit lower down where more detail is given needs clarification. Either way, you probably won't get reviews with a tag in the lead. Johnbod (talk) 11:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

• Which is why I am sure that Whispyhistory, who is the expert on the subject, will be along soon to clarify it. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you @Johnbod:, I did not notice that tag. Added ALT1 and edited article. @Philafrenzy: please advise. You might have a Leonardo Da Vinci hook.Whispyhistory (talk) 13:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

There is little about Leonardo in the article so I would stick with flight simulation but isn't it principles of simulation developed for use in flight simulation, not flight simulation itself? Awake brain surgery could also be the basis of a hook. ::::::::::::::::Philafrenzy (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

nomination still needs a review. Flibirigit (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems: - Approving Alt1

Image eligibility:

• Freely licensed:
• Used in article:
• Clear at 100px: - n

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Earwig flagged a number of passages, but it appears to be a false positive. --evrik ^(talk) 04:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)