Talk:Rokomari.com

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Controversy section dictates overall slant of article

The controversy section of the English Wikipedia article needs checking for issues of bias. It is notable that the original article in Bangla is more focused on information on the website, and functions better as an example of a Wikipedia article. The English article however, is overshadowed by focus on the issue of controversy, something which gives an overall negative focus on the topic. I would encourage editors on working on this stub-class article to present a more enriched and balanced view.

--~Mohammad Hossain~ 09:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the duty of Wikipedia to give either positive or negative overview of a topic i.e., taking side, rather to put factual data for its users. I think your emphasis on so called "positive" should need a check on bias, retrospectively. It is obvious that rokomari.com stand and continue to do so against freedom of speech while selling controversial islamists books. That piece of information is the sole reason why this page has been edited (vandalized) so many times. Yes, I can edit it again but for what end ? Regression on Wikipedia is evident, and this article (rokomari.com) with so many other is the proof of that. goodluck with your white washing of facts for the sake of "positivity". Uthsab (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Rokomari.com Logo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]