Talk:Rohan Kriwaczek

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Untitled

It seems that User:Rohan Kriwaczek tried to create Funerary Violin, but it was deleted. Perhaps after his book comes out Wikipedians will agree to add it back? See User talk:Rohan Kriwaczek. Is there more discussion? <>< tbc 04:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be keener on the Funerary Violin were it not for the fact that several of today's newspapers report the entire book as a hoax, in the process of being denounced by both literary and musicological authorities. -- Simon Cursitor

Phooey. For crying out loud, P. D. Q. Bach is an article! And so should Funerary Violin be. The NPR story inspired me. He's not your run of the mill crackpot that WP has every right to blow off. He convinced a publisher. And he perplexed NPR -- they just didn't fully get it. It took me several days to put it together. I think it's charming. The music itself is astonishing! <>< tbc 18:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Once the book comes out, it'll definitely be worth an article, although I'd be more inclined to have Funerary Violin redirect to the book title, and have the entry there.cbustapeck 17:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. It seems that there already is an article for the book, An Incomplete History of the Art of Funerary Violin. cbustapeck 17:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]