Talk:Roger Williams National Memorial

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Rhode Island Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as High-importance).

Images

@Kzirkel, Jllm06, Magnolia677, XRay, and Commonists: Beginning a discussion here to gain consensus around images. I believe File:2021 Roger Williams National Memorial sign.jpg, which @Beyond My Ken: has repeatedly inserted into the article, is of significantly lower quality than an alternative photograph by @Kzirkel:. Thoughts? Filetime (talk) 01:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filetime, I agree. Just the sign itself is not helpful since the subject of the article is the entire park. (t · c) buidhe 01:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+1 --Commonists (talk) 12:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]