Talk:Roger Steare

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roger Steare article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Statistics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 28 October 2011 by reviewer Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs).

Suggestions

wikify
de-peacock

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiswick Chap (talk • contribs) 22:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration of interest

I own Reach Further, a social learning consultancy, helping Roger Steare with his digital profile.

My team (Luke Beaumont and Bryony Taylor) are trying our best to make this article neutral, how can we improve it?

Liz Cable Lizcable (talk) 10:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Bryony Taylor I work with Liz Cable for Roger Steare. We appreciate any help you can give us in editing this article. Bryony Taylor (talk) 10:32, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll declare an interest, too, as I'm about to provide some consultancy to Reach Further. I've therefore restricted my edits to formatting and linking. However, I would point out that the article was created via the article wizard and was reviewed by an independent and uninvolved member of WikiProject Articles for creation before publication. Additions since then have been relatively minor. No specific issues requiring attention have been identified, and I think (as an editor of long-standing) the article should therefore be de-tagged. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:34, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm declaring my interest too, Luke Beaumont, I work for Reach Further. Lukeb3000 (talk) 12:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if any of you need an independent third party to review any potentially contentious edit. I'll keep an eye on this article.--v/r - T P 19:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag removed

I have no COI; I've reviewed this article and it appears to me to be a neutral presentation of (for the most part) well referenced information. I see no reason for a COI tag on the article page. In my understanding the COI tag is used where there are issues with the page arising out of COI, not merely that article authors have COI. Should any COI related issues be discovered, then by all means re-apply the tag; or, more usefully, fix the issues. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional material

Further to the above I'm now doing some work for Roger, and he's asked me to add some (well-cited, factual) info to the article. I will notify TP and Tagishsimon when I have done so. I also invite others to scrutinise my edits. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now done; here's the diff. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Tagishsimon: I've made another update. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tagishsimon and TParis: ...and again. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I'm painting stuff right now; I'll do a review this evening. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems NPOV and germane to the q. of what is a corporate philosopher. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tagishsimon and TParis: One more, thanks; and this from March, when I forgot to ping you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing: It's starting to come off as promotional. Mentioning every time his name comes up in the news appears to be a list of accomplishments, like how a resume would read. For example, what was the significance to his life that he was profiled in Financial Times? If there was something in that profile worthwhile, why isn't that something mentioned instead?--v/r - T P 17:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change of role; AI

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Noting the CoI declared above, I am told by Steare that he has moved on from his role at Cass Business School. Please therefore change:

He is now Honorary Visiting Professor of Organisational Ethics, and Corporate Philosopher in Residence at the Cass Business School in London. He teaches on the Executive MBA Programs as well as consulting with external corporate clients through Cass Executive Education.^[1]^[2]

to:

He was Honorary Visiting Professor of Organisational Ethics, and Corporate Philosopher in Residence at the Cass Business School in London. He taught on the Executive MBA Programs as well as consulting with external corporate clients through Cass Executive Education.^[1]^[3] As of 2024, he is working at the Financial Times' Headspring Executive Development.^[4]

References

^ ^a ^b Cite error: The named reference Smith was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "Executive Education University 'One of The World Leading Executive Universities'". Cass.city.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 18 November 2011. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
^ "Executive Education University 'One of The World Leading Executive Universities'". Cass.city.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 18 November 2011. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
^ "Future of AI Summit 2024 Agenda - FT Live Event". Financial Times. Retrieved 16 October 2024.

Steare's role at HED is as an Associate Professor, but I don't currently have a source for that.

The source cited above, and [1], can be used to show that Steare is involved in considerations of the ethics of AI. Can that be included based on them, and if, so, using what wording? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done JC I have never seen so many COI declarations on one talk page. lol. I implemented the requested content. However, I think the last sentence about working at the Financial Times could be challenged as primary (although it likely won't). For the question about being "involved in considerations of the ethics of AI," I think we would need a secondary source stating that. Unless I read the source wrong, it looks like an announcement of a lecture he is giving so it would be original research. If there is a secondary source that discusses it in more detail, ping me here or on my talk page and I will take a look as I am sure there is something that can written about it if the source supports. CNMall41 (talk) 06:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

For the COIs watching this page, I am open to suggestions on the lead as I think it could use expansion. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: I have boldly expanded the lede, using only material cited in the article's body. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Smith-1] Cite error: The named reference Smith was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[2] "Executive Education University 'One of The World Leading Executive Universities'". Cass.city.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 18 November 2011. Retrieved 17 December 2011.

[3] "Executive Education University 'One of The World Leading Executive Universities'". Cass.city.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 18 November 2011. Retrieved 17 December 2011.

[4] "Future of AI Summit 2024 Agenda - FT Live Event". Financial Times. Retrieved 16 October 2024.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]