Talk:Roger Love

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the subject is noteworthy, shown by the number of trustworthy primary sources used for this article. --Nzgabriel (talk) 11:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Nzgabriel, do you own rights for the photo you have uploaded? If you weren't a photographer who took this photo, you need a written permission to upload it. Even if you are affiliated with a person who depicted on a picture you have no copyright for the file. --Dignitee (talk) 15:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the question Dignitee. As per the file page, the photo was taken from his website, which shows the photo as being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You can see the photo and the licence near the bottom of this page here: https://rogerlove.com/singing/singing-about-roger/. Nzgabriel (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a chat, there was no need to ping me for an answer to my question. --Dignitee (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Nzgabriel, you restored the advertising info I previously removed. Information must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. If you want to discuss your removed text in question — you got to start a discussion on a talk page, after getting familiar with WP:NOTADVERTISING. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion of your clients. You can not restore the text that was removed without consensus reached in discussion. --Dignitee (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. My main concerns with the edit was that added information I couldn't find sources for, the ambigious information, and one of the sources you added seemed like a spam website. For example, I could find no sources that there is a dog named Gigi; there is no source that he was born into a working-class family; and his birth year is noted as "around 1969-1970". This website does not seem like a reliable source: https://www.theintroverteddoctor.com/rogerlove as per: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Biographies_of_living_persons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nzgabriel (talk • contribs) 01:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We are talking about puffery and advertising about your client that you're repeatedly adding. --Dignitee (talk) 07:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]