Talk:Roger Federer/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Armbrust Talk Contribs 02:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- The following senteces doesn't make any sense. ("Federer made six doubles finals during this time, but lost the Indian Wells Masters event in 2002, which the most prestigious events won are two Rotterdam 500 series events in 2001 and 2002" and "Federer would go onto win two other events that were Master Series 1000 tournaments in Madrid over Rafael Nadal in the final on clay by a score of 6–4, 6–4, and he would win Cincinnati over Novak Djokovic by a score of 6–1, 7–5, which he would lose in one 500 level event final in Basel to Novak Djokovic 4–6, 6–4, 2–6.") Armbrust Talk Contribs 04:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- The following sentence should be rewriten. ("In the 2003 season, Federer won his first slam title in the 2003 Wimbledon Championships, which he won it over Mark Philippoussis, and the score of this final was 7–6(5), 6–2, 7–6(3).") Armbrust Talk Contribs 04:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- The following senteces doesn't make any sense. ("Federer made six doubles finals during this time, but lost the Indian Wells Masters event in 2002, which the most prestigious events won are two Rotterdam 500 series events in 2001 and 2002" and "Federer would go onto win two other events that were Master Series 1000 tournaments in Madrid over Rafael Nadal in the final on clay by a score of 6–4, 6–4, and he would win Cincinnati over Novak Djokovic by a score of 6–1, 7–5, which he would lose in one 500 level event final in Basel to Novak Djokovic 4–6, 6–4, 2–6.") Armbrust Talk Contribs 04:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- A. Prose quality:
- Fixed, but go check to see if you like what I did!BLUEDOGTN 05:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- B. MoS compliance:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- In the "1998–2002: Early career in the ATP" section the "exacted revenge" phrase should be replaced. Armbrust Talk Contribs 04:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- This was actually in 2006, which I took it out, and go look at [Google cashe]!BLUEDOGTN 05:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- If meets all the criteria of WP:GAN. Armbrust Talk Contribs 05:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)