Talk:Roger Cloutier
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mariupol
[edit]On RT.COM they said that he is there. 178.220.80.160 (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Which means he isn't. 77.234.77.153 (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Hopefully he's in the same place Ayatollah Mike is in ... hell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.28.7.186 (talk) 07:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-cloutier-captured-idUSL2N2W914L He is not captured, after all. I'm sorry, I don't know English very well, so here's the factcheck and you can read the rest yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.81.213.255 (talk) 06:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Appereance
[edit]Was he seen in the last two weeks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.185.42.17 (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, in Izyum Turkey giving a speech at a NATO event. Confirmed by NATO spokesperson, NATO facebook page photos and his own LinkedIn page photos. If Russia says he's captured you can pretty much guarantee he isnt. MartyKopka (talk) 06:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
NATO not a proven source of Appearance
[edit]As NATO is since Ramstein meeting on 26. april 2022 one of the weapon suppliers its not a credible source. There is a big chance that Cloutier in deed still is in Mariupol and that thats the reason why they dont give up. There is no independent proof yet that he s not captured there, a LinkedIn(!) profile is not a credible source as it is not posted by himself. And the sources all guide to Nato. 178.220.80.160 (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Multiple reliable sources describe this rumor as false. If you are aware of any reliable sources that disagree, or which question the authorship of the LinkedIn posts, please share those sources here so that other editors can check them out. Squeakachu (talk) 22:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Never mind about claims, has anybody actually seen this guy since 2022? 182.239.146.143 (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, nobody appears to have seen this general since 2022. 14.2.193.105 (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind about claims, has anybody actually seen this guy since 2022? 182.239.146.143 (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles