Talk:Rod Underhill (district attorney)

This page was proposed for deletion by Iridescent (talk · contribs) on 29 March 2022.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... 1. His predecessor was newsworthy.

2. His successor was newsworthy.

3. The office itself has repeatedly been in the news.

4. He himself was newsworthy for his decision to resign, as well as controversies with the judiciary that have national ramification.

5. Insufficient time to add the necessary information to the article to prove all this, this was proposed for speedy deletion less than two hours after it was created. Why can´t you just move it to "draft", instead of wasting my time and potentially driving away productive editors?

6. Ignorance is not an excuse for abdication the encyclopedic mission.

7. WP:Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia

Jaredscribe (talk) 04:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]