Talk:Rod Pacheco

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

October 2009

I just rollback reverted a huge addition of unsourced text. That was an error, I meant to hit undo and leave an edit summary. My objection to the addition is that it is entirely unsourced, negative in tone, and purports to give the information from a recently-filed lawsuit. Allegations in a lawsuit do not constitute reliable sources that the events occurred. If reported by a reliable source, the fact of the lawsuit, and (much smaller) summary of the allegations may be appropriate, with due consideration for WP:NPOV, especially WP:UNDUE. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of reverting the edits myself, or possibly summarizing. It appears the text was a copy of a Press Enterprise article titled: Riverside County DA sued by former prosecutor. MissionInn.Jim (talk) 14:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like the summary. I tweaked it a bit, but at this point I think that is a good level of detail for the allegations. Anyone can file a civil suit and make any claims that they want. If there is a judgment or settlement covered by reliable sources, then we'll be in a position to add more. Thanks for the addition. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 21:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]