This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
A couple of references were added to the article as well as a notability tag. 83 words of "readable prose" is not much more than a dictionary entry and presents nothing more than a pseudo biography.
One area of concern is the notability of the subject to support a stand alone WP:BLP. IMDb was used as a sole source that is contrary to current community consensus as it is not considered reliable. It actually contains no biographical information other than the filmography. The two added sources are central to the Beetles and the subject being one of 10 that played Paul McCartney.
There is still a question of notability. A search returned some interesting information on Dr. Rod A. Culbertson. This is not the subject. Other entries include Wikipedia, IMDb, Twitter, Amazon, and peoplepill.com. The last one is user generated.
This is a 2009 article that has eluded any improvements in over 10 years. While there is no timeline to improvable articles, there is a point when it is not unreasonable to wonder if there is more than minimum notability. There may be sources "out there" but WP:NEXIST also contains: However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface. so any interested editors please see if appropriate sources can be found. -- Otr500 (talk) 01:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
