Talk:Rococo painting
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Pintura do Rococó from pt.wikipedia. |
@Fram I saw you redirected this page to Rococo#Painting. I think this topic is important enough and the current article is long enough to deserve a separate entry, especially given that Rococo#Painting is not very detailed. If you think a merge would be better, I think it would be better to discuss in the Talk page first (and in case we do proceed with a merge, I think a lot of content from this page can be transferred over).
Note that this is not a machine translation, even though Deepl was used for the initial draft -- it was manually human-reviewed, but may still contain mistakes as the translator is not a specialist in the field.
(note: I tried redirecting the pain to Rococo painting, without the capitalization, but unfortunately a redirect exists there already, so I am not sure which tools should be used to preserve history)
7804j (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- This article has the same issues as most of the efforts of this campaign, and reads like a poorly translated essay more than a neutral, factual encyclopedic article. This one at least isn't written from a Spanish or Portuguese viewpoint but a more general one, but even so it is better to lead our readers to the existing paragraph for now. An article on Rococo painting would be worthwhile, but this one isn't it. Fram (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)