Talk:Rockfall protection embankment
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rockfall protection embankment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Un-declining
[edit]On second thought, Gravhaz, I see no reason this shouldn't just go into draftspace. I'm going to do some more maintenance and then I'll move it over. For reference, I'm copying my review comment as it'll still be pertinent:
This looks pretty good—the one thing I think that could help is maybe some better organization (see Wikipedia:Writing better articles) among other language improvements (I've copyedited it a bit to help with that), as well as some references for the paragraph that begins with "The very first use". If you haven't already seen, you might want to check out Rockfall § Mitigation as well.
Hopefully this helps, and thank you for taking the time to write this! :) Perryprog (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/19 January 2021
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Stub-Class CE articles
- Low-importance CE articles
- WikiProject Civil engineering articles
- Stub-Class Highways articles
- Low-importance Highways articles
- Stub-Class Road transport articles
- Low-importance Road transport articles
- WikiProject Highways articles