Talk:Rocket (Beyoncé song)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

If anyone is reading this and wondering why this is a quick-pass, please refer to the previous GAN in which I reviewed to almost no major concerns and had to close due to inactivity. I can confirm that all points in the previous GAN had been met, and I felt ashamed to have failed it due to those minor prose issues not being addressed. As everything has been addressed in the last GAN, I'll promote it this time ☯ Jaguar ☯ 16:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]