Talk:Rock of Love with Bret Michaels season 2

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Elimination Table

I felt that there was no reason to have a separate color for "Received a VIP pass, but was eliminated", because the first column lists who received the passes. Thelordnyax (talk) 21:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I felt the category of "Constestant was selected to be eliminated, but was safe due to another leaving" was not needed as there was no solid proof of this, nor was it mentioned in the episode. The focus on that constestant may have made it seem like she would have been next, but that is not enough proof. ArcAngel (talk) 13:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, the Call-Out Order should be the way it is suppose to be. so I'mma fix it the way it was before. Don't tell me wat to change. (Sorry, English no good.)

User:Cookie Monster (User talk:Cookie Monster) 22:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was the way it was before you changed it for a reason. There's simply no need to put background colors on every possible "category" for each girl as some want to do. ArcAngel (talk) 21:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, I don't think people should be adding a color for every little thing, it's annoying because some people keep this up with every show on Vh1. Seriously, it's stupid. You only need 1 COLOR which should be for ELIMINATED. That's what the elimination table is for, isn't it? (talk)

All of the colors are annoying! especially the new one "was safe but did not receive a pass" someone please fix this?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.85.107 (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contestants

I think there needs to be more info about the contestants like bust size. Maybe a little section for each with standard details? JewelzEyes (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should change Ambre's age to 37, but add in a side note or something that she said she was 31 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.244.42 (talk) 03:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There may be enough reason for a separate page for Ambre Lake. She hosts a nationally syndicated television show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MentorTormentor (talk • contribs) 17:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ambre said she was 32 in the clip they aired on the most recent episode. Not 31.Cruelncute (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Contestant with the most first 3 call-outs- Ambre Lake and Daisy DeLa Hoya,both 8 times" is incorrect if the table is correct. Ambre was called in the first 3 8 times, however Daisy was only called in the first 3 7 times.Cruelncute (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know which 2 contestants weren't on the reunion show? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cruelncute (talk • contribs) 22:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elimination Table

Information should not be added until episode has aired. Missjessica254 (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Like all vh1 shows on Sunday, there is an original airing at around 12:00 AM, and a more advertised/popular airing Sunday night. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 07:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

However, this information was added on a Friday. Missjessica254 (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the elimination table taken off? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SChaos1701 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica was eliminated...so someone add that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.140.29 (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain what a VIP pass is? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.232.58 (talk) 22:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article clean-up

I requested indefinite semi-protection for this article (and it was granted) since there were SOOOOO many IP's changing things unnecessarily. I have worked to try and un-do some of those changes. The elimination table was changed so that it uses the same colors as Season 1, and it has been simplified with only a handful of color coding, instead of the unneeded dozen or so. I have also added the ages back in, and plan to do more work on it to hopefully make it better. ArcAngel (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under "Contestant Information" in the final bullet regarding Ambre's age, "instead" is misspelled. Jman234 (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I realize that you stopped letting people edit the page. First of all, i am the first one to edit this page after someone has been eliminated. i understand that you dont want people changing the article, but seriously, isn't that what Wikipedia is about?

That's flat untrue, right there. If that were the case, the page would be FULLY protected so that only admins could edit it. As it stands now, IP's cannot edit the page, nor can new accounts less than 4 days old - how is that stopping EVERYone?

As I stated above, there were too many unnecessary changes being made to the article. But, if you have been keeping up with the page history, you'll see that the page is still being edited often, and again - things are being added that shouldn't. I tried to make the chart consistant with that of Season 1, but obviously that failed, so I have tried to keep out incorrect information. If you are upset that you can "no longer" edit the page, I suggest signing up for an account. ArcAngel (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy hasn't won. There should not be information about it yet. Ambre could win still, because the show doesn't air until sunday. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.182.129 (talk) 23:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy's height?

The article says that Daisy's height is 4'6". I find that kind of hard to believe. Can anyone comfirm this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.207.202.168 (talk) 03:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.metalsludge.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1444&Itemid=1

States that she is 5'3" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.235.213 (talk) 23:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ambre sets record straight about her age

Dude Ambre's atually 37 she lied to Bret —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.241.111 (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She claims that she never lied to Bret. She says she never actually told him her age. That it was editing done by the producers.

http://www.buddytv.com/articles/rock-of-love/rock-of-love-2-ambre-tells-the-18338.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.202.215.28 (talk) 01:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuit

Anyone think this should be added to this seasons article? Angry Homeowner —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.2.102 (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not related to the show - just an angry homeowner who wants his 15 minutes. ArcAngel (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What

Destiney Moore and Ambre Lake: Horror Movie Scream Queens

I thought it was important to mention that Ambre Lake had previously appeared in a movie known as "Dead End Road." The movie was a film adaptation of several Edgar Alan Poe stories. She plays the initial victim of a serial killer.

Also, Destiney Moore was recently featured as "Stripper #2" in the horrible horror movie, "Triloquist." The movie is about a psychotic pair of siblings and their homicidal ventriloquist dummy, and randomly thrown into the mix is a topless Destiney Moore of Rock Of Love 2 fame. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.212.240.120 (talk) 16:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Direct Link

There´s a death link to laceyconner.com in the additional cast. It has to be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.179.226.19 (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]