Talk:Rochor MRT station/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 13:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

First up I looked at GA1 and the principle issue was with copyvio, so first up I ran Earwig and it looks good, so I think that issue has been satisfactorily addressed in general.
"construction of the station began in 2009. The construction of the station" repetitive.
Link for Rochor Canal?
Lead feels a little bit short, I would add a sentence or two more about the challenges of the construction, the ridership perhaps and the artwork.
"Bus, Taxi" -> Bus, taxi"
"Disabled access" yes in the infobox, not noted in the prose or referenced.
Depth of "26m" (should be spaced/converted) where is this referenced and mentioned in the prose?
I would expect to see ridership in the article as well as the infobox.
" $803.3 " which dollar?
"1.6 million" add a non-breaking space.
"as Church - Our Lady of L'des," en-dash.
"other DTL Stage 2 stations." you already abbreviated that to DTL2.
"the Downtown line (DTL) and" already abbreviated...
"of January 2021. the" comma, not .
What're "headways"?
"ceiling motif is inspired by the interior" sounds like a brochure.
"The spaciousness of the layout allows ease of movement" I would suggest you stick to encyclopedic tone, e.g. "designed to allow ease of movement"
"To draw the artwork, the students bought vintage objects.." not sure what that first clause is saying, the students bought vintage objects to draw, not the other way round.

First pass done. On hold. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 21:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed the points above. Removed on 26m, cos I am not sure where did the number come from originally. Also, I thought as you go into the next section, you have to abbreviate again, so that's why for Downtown line (DTL). Should I actually just leave it as DTL"--ZKang123 (talk) 02:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]