Talk:Robocall/Archives/2016

This is an archive of past discussions about Robocall. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Robocall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Include Robocall solutions section

I have written a section for the page about consumer solutions which combat robocalls. I suggest that it does not merit its own page, but could be placed after the Reverse robocalling section. I have taken into account the issue The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. and it has been written from a more international perspective than the rest of the page.

Draft:Robocall solutions

--Gmseow (talk) 14:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Gmseow This is great content. You provided information with citations to reliable sources. Are you feeling shy about posting this into the article? If you are, then I would copy/paste it for you, but you could be bold and do it. I support the addition of this content into the article. What can I do to help? Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, include this content. Glrx (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the positive feedback Bluerasberry and Glrx. Is there a way to move the draft article into the parent article as a new section, preserving the edit history (just for sake of completeness)? I had a look and couldn't find a way of doing it, but I'm guessing I've just missed it. Gmseow (talk) 11:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Gmseow There is not a way to preserve edit history at the level of individual sections. Edit history is only kept for whole articles. There are some ways to combine entire article edit histories, but in this case, that would not apply.

The most apparent way forward in this case is to copy the "robocall solutions" draft into the main robocall article. This will result in a one-line edit being logged in the history of the main article.

In the future, you can do things the way you did this time, or if you like, make multiple edits directly into the main article as you are drafting whatever content you wish to share. Ask if you have questions. I expect you can manage the copy/paste but if you need assistance then I am here at your request. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

No problem, I'll just paste it in. Thanks again Bluerasberry Gmseow (talk) 14:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

When you do the edit, the edit summary should include a wikilink to Draft:Robocall solutions to follow CC BY-. 16:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)