Talk:Robo-advisor

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dhanno1234. Peer reviewers: Maxgemm.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Individual robo-advisors

Outside the list of notable robo-advisors, this page is *not* a place to describe individual firms. That can be done on their respective company pages.Like.liberation 19:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Wixify

Does Wixify belong in the list of notable robo-advisors. I do not believe it is notable enough from a simple google search, but I could be wrong. Tazerdadog (talk) 03:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First robo-advisor

I have reverted the recent addition of a first robo-advisor in 2002. To be clear, I have absolutely nothing against the author, but such claims of pioneership should be based on independent 3rd-party sources (especially as it seems to directly contradict the currently sourced information from ref #6). GermanJoe (talk) 11:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]