Talk:Roberts House (Mobile, Alabama)

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

reference to a general search screen

About the "Property Tax Bill Search" source, can the search terms to use be included in the reference, perhaps in a parenthetical hint? E.g. say the parcel number or the search phrase that will yield info on this property, for users not familiar with the system? doncram (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC) P.S. Searching on address="3 Wimbledon Drive East" does not work, by the way. doncram (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check the "search by address" and enter "3 Wimbledon." Altairisfar _talk 23:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, i see that works. The system lists the property at "3 Wimbledon Dr", and a search on exactly that also works, while searches on "3 Wimbledon Dr." and "3 Wimbledon Drive" do not. Also see that a "sales history" tab provides other information that u used in the article. This is all pretty minor, but I'll try to give an appropriate hint in the reference. If you want to revise or drop this addition to the footnote, please feel free. I was just a tad frustrated, as I was wanting to check that this source did not in fact provide the architectural details given in the article, which you had announced at the NRHP wikiproject. I like the pic and the short article! doncram (talk) 23:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I couldn't dedicate more time to it yesterday, it was my b'day and I was running around like a madman getting ready for a party. I agree with your points and the changes look good to me. Thanks! Altairisfar _talk 13:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]