Talk:Roberto Assagioli

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Balanced presentation

There must be someone who is critical of this man's work. Their views should be included. The phrase "approach to finding inner peace and harmony" sounds like advertising. And how, exactly, does one become a "visionary"? 170.71.252.34 (talk) 03:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--

As an impartial observer coming into this article to find out about Assagioli and Psychosynthesis, I thought the article was fairly balanced. Can a wiki editor please re-evaluate this claim and remove the label? It seems inappropriate to me. The Psychology Today article does include some critique. GeoFan49 (talk) 19:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. William Avery (talk) 10:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

second impartial observer

I came to this article after hearing of Assagioli's work for the first time today. Don't know one way or the other whether the article is factually biased, but in places, its vocabulary seems to betray an "insider" perspective rather than an encyclopedic perspective. What in blazes does the expression "mediates students" mean? Is this a term of art? Or insider jargon? A localism? It needs to be explained, or replaced with other wording. 04:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Publius3 (talk)

so it does. I think a total rewrite is needed. Otherwise, it might be very much likely to be liable for deletion as promotional. DGG ( talk ) 00:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hasn't been deleted yet. Today I removed a fair amount of "continued impact" because it's more suited to another article than this one. The entire Psychology Today interview as a section is really awful, but I don't have the wherewithal to change it. It's just a source, and there certainly doesn't need to be a section devoted to it, but what needs to happen is for relevant bits to be incorporated elsewhere.--~T P W 01:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roberto Assagioli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/69WMBskaT?url=http://www.psykosyntese.dk/a-146/ to http://www.psykosyntese.dk/a-146/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Roberto Assagioli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]