Talk:Robert of Bath/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 02:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Prose comments below
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
I checked some of the references and found no issues with verifiability or plagiarism.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
No images, presumably because none are available
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Just two minor comments below, otherwise it definitely meets the GA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 03:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"He was the bishop that organized the archdeacons of the diocese on a territorial basis." does that mean he reorganized the archdeacons to operate on a territorial basis? If so, this could be more clear
- Let's try "He was the bishop that set up the territorial organization of the archdeacons of the diocese." Is that better? Ealdgyth (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Robert also built at Bath" what does this mean?
- Is "Robert continued the building work on church building at Bath," better? Ealdgyth (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Buidhe just checking in... Ealdgyth (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry, I managed to miss your comments. I am satisfied and will pass it now. (t · c) buidhe 23:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]