Talk:Robert Trappl

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Cybernetics.

Relevance of this article

The relevance of this article is questionable.--193.171.142.61 12:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is "just" a beginning, and these kinds of article often do not yet give a very complete image of the subject. If you have anymore notable information please let us know, or improve the article yourselve. - Mdd 14:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the relevance of the person. I am not aware of any major contributions he did to the subject of cybernetics, apart from bringing the right people together for collaboration (resulting in all his books..). If there are any, I'm curious about them.--193.171.142.52 15:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With a google rate of more then 50.000, to my experience, he should be notable. The problem with these kind of scientists is however, that you need to be an expert in his field, to be able to determing which of his contributions realy are more notable then others. Are you such an expert?

The reason why I find this person important is, because of work for the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR) and all his editoral work around it. As president of the ISFR he helped to establish the field of systems science. - Mdd 11:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]