Talk:Robert T. Webb Sculpture Garden

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

NFCC violations removed

There is zero critical commentary on the works, we dont need to see each work to understand that it exists. BRD doesnt apply to NFCC I am re-removing. The files violate WP:NFCC#1,3,8 and shouldnt be re-added. Werieth (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So a day after being blocked for edit warring (and apparently not for the first time), you attempt to start another war? "BRD doesnt apply to NFCC I am re-removing." Really, how so? I remind you once again: these are your interpretations of policy, not the only interpretation. You are not the final word. freshacconci talk to me 19:58, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The files that I removed where decorative, they are not critical to the content and are eye candy. Please keep personal issues out of this policy discussion. Werieth (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You flatter yourself. This is nothing personal -- I'm pointing out the editing patterns of a disruptive and uncivil editor, patterns that impact on policy discussion. And I notice you don't really respond to my points. That's quite telling. freshacconci talk to me 20:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is one sentence that provides any reference to File:Rob Willms Trojan Taurus.jpg and that is a very very basic sentence stating what the genre the work is, there is zero critical commentary. WP:NFCC#8 requires that the file's removal is detrimental given a lack of critical commentary, it is no where near being met. Werieth (talk) 20:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, "requires"? No, it does not say that. I quote in its entirety: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Let me break that down for you: you feel the image does not increase the readers' understanding and that its omission is not detrimental to understanding. I disagree. The only thing "required" is a discussion. freshacconci talk to me 20:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What part of the text is not understandable without the image? The article is about a garden, one example of the types of work there will serve the same purpose, we dont need a image for each work in the garden. If you think this warrants a wider discussion WP:NFCR is your third door on your left. Werieth (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]