Talk:Robert Stone (novelist)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

'A Flag for Sunrise'

I'm surprised there is no examination here of 'A Flag for Sunrise.' I just finished reading it, and it is a real heartbreaking gem of a novel.

proletaire2003@yahoo.com

Miasnikov (talk) 21:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC) miasnikov Miasnikov (talk) 21:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Flag for Sunrise was the first of Stone's novels I read, and I agree with you. It looks like there is a plot synopsis there that might postdate your comment. In any event, you are always free to add to Wikipedia! Digthepast (talk) 19:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why the tags?

I'm seeing a cleanup tag and a neutrality tag, but there's nothing here on the discussion page to justify either one. I'm going to wander away and come back in a while, and unless I see something here to warrant those tags, I'll just treat them as vandalism, and pull them. Digthepast (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gone. --dr5t3v3 2011-08-26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.142.176 (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I support your decision here to pull these tags. Both tags should have been pulled, neither tag was justified. I don't see a neutrality issue at all in the discussion of Prime Green. And why the cleanup tag and saying this section reads like a review? Anyhow, right on. The tags needed to be removed.Christian Roess (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Stone (novelist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628232457/http://www.gf.org/fellows/14265-robert-a-stone to http://www.gf.org/fellows/14265-robert-a-stone

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Structure

Heey:) I added some information's and worked on the structure of the publications. So it´s clearly arranged :) Greetings to the wiki community :)--Princheeseanastasia (talk) 07:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]