Talk:Robert McKee

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Mckee is far more than a seminar instructor

Robert Mckee is known Hollywood and Broadway figure, and the Wikipedia entry should be broadened accordingly. (Friday 10-Nov-2006 04:05PM GMT+2)

- Done at 11-Nov-2006 02:16AM GMT+2

Who are these award-winners?

"26 Academy Award winners, 125 Emmy Award winners, 19 WGA..." who? Is there a list? Were the awards given for writing? Were the awards given after they attended the sceminar? Were the awards verifiably given at all? More than a citation is needed. An explanation is needed. Youdontsmellbad 22:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your points, so you are welcome to research and post any citations; I took the official numbers that are presented at the McKee website. I guess that not all award winners won it for their writing, yet all of them did take the course, before or after winning. —comment added by John Hyams^(t/c)

I have already added clarifications in the article (in parentheses). John Hyams 05:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a pretty stock answer, john. but the burden of proof is not on the person who finds fault, but the person who wrote the thing. i suggest that you fix the problem or i'll be happy to remove the reference. Youdontsmellbad 01:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a patronizing comment. I have no burden of proof whatsoever, the McKee website is reliable enough. When your character is portrayed by an Emmy-Award actor, you do not go and lie in your website about who attended your course. Would you like a copy of all the receipts? You go and prove how many Austrian soldiers died in the battle of Austerlitz! John Hyams 04:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

looks good now. my apologies if i replied harshly after you'd already fixed the problem. Youdontsmellbad 06:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources (online and paper). These "statistics" about award-winners are unduly self-serving. Actually the entire article is rather unbalanced in its style of writing. --Cinematical 12:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo was taken in 2005, not in 2006

As a participant in the Nov 2006 course, I know for a fact that the current photo was taken in his previous and first visit to Israel, in 2005, not in 2006. McKee did not wear all black in his 2006 visit. In fact, he wore as follows: 1) first day: blue shirt 2) second day: light-brown shirt and brown pants 3) third day: blue jeans with a light-color shirt. In the photo, the hall of the Cinemateque is indeed the same, but a year before (2005). John Hyams

Additional rearrangement

The Casablanca info is an anecdote, so it should be moved to that section. Number of participants should be moved to the section about the seminar.

-- Done. —comment added by John Hyams^(t/c)

also there is nothing about criticism/backlash/dislike of mckee. when i was at film school, mckee was mostly considered a joke. and in my experience most film professors and students at other schools were of the same opinion. 24.185.239.254 03:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went to USC's MFA Screenwriting Program and his book was not required nor referenced in any classes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.8.126.131 (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This whole page comes off as far too worshipful to me, I also found everyone in my film school and in the industry now that I'm in it kind of consider McKee a joke. Also the anecdote about "give a director 120 blank pages and say DIRECT THIS" is ... of questionable merit in an encyclopedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.207.206.210 (talk) 09:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anecdotes

Anecdotes? Are these really necessary? It doesn't seem very encyclopedic to me, and quite superfluous here. --46.117.237.207 (talk) 16:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McKee credits

R. McKee doesn't appear as a writer on the Wikipedia list of episodes or writers pages of Kojak, Columbo, Spenser: For Hire and Quincy, M.E.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Spenser:_For_Hire_Episodes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Columbo_writers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Quincy,_M.E._episodes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kojak_episodes

According to his IMDBpro profile, he is only credited as a writer for 1 episode of Spenser, and for Mrs Columbo among 21 other writers : http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0571210/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

This should be corrected — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tireatute (talk • contribs) 16:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robert McKee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grandson of HIm

Should I add known relative of him? I am his grandson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RelatableBryan (talk • contribs) 16:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

poorly sourced biography

not certain where these notable claims came from, but they are unsourced and removed.

please source and cite additions correctly, and avoid conflicts of interest by not editing your own page.

thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 16:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]