Jump to content

Talk:Robert Griswold

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sexual assault allegations

[edit]

Are the cited sources reputable? May need rewriting to maintain neutrality. Removed one source because it appears to be a copy of the other on a blog/unreputable site. Glman99 (talk) 14:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The primary source is used appropriately. See wikipedia:PRIMARYCARE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:2143:8500:484:9FAE:1A0F:9C17 (talk) 09:17, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure it is - simply because the complaint itself is definitely biased against the subject, and using huge sections of direct quotes does not seem useful in the article. I'd rewrite to cite news articles and refrain from using direct quotes for entire paragraphs. Glman99 (talk) 20:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree that we don't need to be using direct quotes from the legal complaint. We should report the facts according to what reliable news sources say. Marquardtika (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to spend some time editing that section to include as much information as possible without using a paragraph of quotes. If someone else wants to take a crack before I do, they're welcome to it! Glman99 (talk) 01:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]