Jump to content

Talk:Robert Goff, Baron Goff of Chieveley/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • A minor thing and certainly (as far as I know) not GA criteria, but I always look to keep leads clean of references as in principle everything noted in the lead should be in the main part of the article too and can be referenced there. This even applies to the direct quotations. Just makes for a better-looking intro?
  • I've removed the references and moved some of the material from the lead into the main section. The comments by Andrew Burrows and Stephen Tomlinson aren't in the main part of the article, so I've left the citations for those two, if that's okay. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "His father Lionel Goff " seeing as you introduced him in full in the previous sentence, no need to repeat Goff. And subsequent sentence...
  • "Royal Military Academy, Woolwich and" comma after Woolwich.
  • Kind of kicks off twice, "Robert Goff was born" starts two paras. A little odd for me.
  • "He was closer to his mother than his father. Unlike his" seek to merge to avoid short sentence and quick repeat of "his father".
  • "piano and taught him to play it." reads a little odd, no need for "it".
  • " He left Eton ..." quite a few run-ons in this sentence.
  • Odd subdivision in the Early life and education: his start at Oxford after his military service precedes the military service subsection. A bit chronologically wonky.
  • Not quite sure what to do about this... he was assigned a place at Oxford before his military service began. Would it be better to say, at the beginning of the "University education" subsection, that he received this place upon leaving Eton? Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've edited it so that the early education only mentions Goff having a place at Oxford. It then talks about his military service, following which he takes up the place at Oxford. Does this work? Alternatively, I could edit the section heading to read: "Early life, military service, and higher education". Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any reason that "Guard Duty" is capitalised?
  • Only that it was capitalised in the reference, perhaps to indicate that it was not regular sentry duty but had a ceremonial element. I suppose this is clear from the fact that it was Windsor Castle. Changed to lower caps. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • No reason for Tutors to be capitalised.
  • "Lord Goff as a soldier, circa 1944." image caption is a fragment so no need for a full stop.
  • "Combination Room .[11]" remove space before ref, and consider a link for JCR?
  • "the Bar after" why is Bar capitalised?
  • I'm not certain what the convention is, but every instance I've seen of the practicing Bar in the UK has the first letter capitalised (e.g. London Bar). It seems its the opposite in the US. Is it preferable to put it in lower caps? Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm inclined to say that it should be capitalised. The Cambridge English Dictionary capitalises it. [1] I've had a look around: the UK [2] and Australian [3] Bar Associations capitalise it, though the New York [4] and Ontario [5] Bar Associations don't. Since the subject was British, maybe we should leave it capitalised? Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 10:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "1954-55" (and others) use an en-dash for year ranges.
  • "This was initially a joint project with Maudsley, but their partnership later fell through" again, it feels like you're letting the cat out of the bag when you later go on to explain the breakdown in their partnership, I don't think you need to introduce it here?
  • A.W.B is overlinked. As is New and Lincoln college.
  • You use QC before stating Queen's Counsel, and it's overlinked.
  • I've removed the "Queen's Counsel". I don't think I can expand "Ashton Roskill QC" to "Ashton Roskill, Queen's Counsel (QC)" without making it look clunky and artificial. I think I'll leave it as "QC", with a link so a reader can see what that means. Somewhat like "OBE". Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • On second thought, "Ashton Roskill, Queen's Counsel" sounds fine. I've expanded it to that (without "QC" in parentheses), and I've added a link to the next instance of "QC". Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "titled Judge, Jurist and Legislature, i" usually avoid inline external links.
  • "by Lord Neuberger[25] and Jack Beatson.[26]" just move that [25] to the end to avoid awkward placement.
  • Beatson is overlinked.
  • List of cases, some end with a full stop and some don't.
  • British Airways is overlinked.
  • Butterworth is also.
  • "rampant Or." fragment, no full stop needed.
  • "Fier Sans Tache [38]" remove space before ref and I imagine this, being Latin, should be italics.
  • Not sure either "See also" is needed here.
  • Check ref titles, spaced hyphens should be spaced en-dashes.
  • Check publishers, works etc, e.g. "Country Life UK" should be Country Life and it's unnecessary to include UK.
  • Not sure I saw any prose about the succession of Lord Browne-Wilkinson to the position of Senior Law Lord?
  • Added the line: "He retired in 1998, but continued to sit on cases occasionally until his 75th birthday. He was succeeded as Senior Lord of Appeal in Ordinary by Lord Browne-Wilkinson, and his vacant seat on the House of Lords bench was taken over by his former junior Lord Hobhouse."
  • Ref 38 could use a page number, isbn etc.
  • Year ranges need en-dash, e.g. 2017-2018.

That's all I have for a quick review. On hold while we go over them. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 14:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), thank you for such a thorough review, and for your patience with the many errors of style. I've done most of the edits, with a couple I'm not sure how to address. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 03:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kohlrabi Pickle I've responded in line above, not much to do really except perhaps double check the "bar/Bar" usage. Let me know when you're done and I'll do one final pass. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 09:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man Thanks again! I've checked the bar/Bar question and responded inline too. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 10:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I'm happy with that and the article easily meets the GA criteria. Good work. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 10:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Goff,_Baron_Goff_of_Chieveley/GA2&oldid=947954778"