Talk:Robert Cormier

Robert Cormier was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 22, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
February 13, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Children's literature C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

"This article has comments here"

Here is the entire content of the linked comments page, which can now be deleted. -P64

all in all good... but it mentions nothing about multiple books of his being banned....
—(from edit history) 02:57, 6 September 2007‎ 69.2.7.125

GA on hold

This article is well-referenced. I've fixed a few formatting issues (there shouldn't be a space between the period and the ref, just a little thing). The first thing I'm thinking, though, is that the article doesn't cover the breadth requirement for GA yet. Such a controversial author surely has more out there about him than six references can cover. Also, some parts of the article need copy-editing. Maybe get someone not familiar with the subject to look it over and make it a little less choppy and repetitive. The lead is also a bit short. I think it ought to mention some of his awards and a little more about his life. I also expect it will get bigger as the main body of the article does. I'm putting th GA on hold for at least 7 days, so if it's fixed by then, I'll pass it. Wrad (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Such a controversial author surely has more out there about him than six references can cover."

I would think so too, bu tI could not find any Reliable Sources about the subject other than those. I'm also not a great Google Searcher, I'll see if I can get some other people to help me. Soxred93 | talk count bot 22:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try whatever library -- academic or public -- that you have a card for; you can likely search indexes like EBSCO or Gale on line. Toronto Public gives me the Canadian Periodical Index, which is basically Gale. Searching on "Cormier, Robert" as a subject gets me 54 full-text articles. Some are irrelevant hits, and others are reviews, but there's also, e.g., "Teen Wars : The young adult fiction of Robert Cormier" in World and I (Dec 2001) clocking in at 3174 words.

Your article is a good start on Cormier. There's some rewording that I think would improve what's there now. If I have a chance, I'll make some changes. Epanalepsis (talk) 03:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm failing this as GA. I just can't see how it could possibly satisfy the breadth requirement with no print sources. Wrad (talk) 18:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment four years later

After making some improvements (previous version) I downgrade it from B to C, Children's lit (and I suppose the B grades predate class C). Some problems:

After reading this article (and I am the cheese) I must guess some replacement for {infobox} genre "Suspense, Young Adult", which is outlandish but had not been displayed because of syntax error --(about genre see the new Talk section)
The image lacks a caption
(Quoting the lead) "His most popular works ... all of which have won awards." --but the awards are nowhere identified
(Quoting the Life) "... went on to become an award-winning journalist" but no award is identified. --and he is a columnist in the lead but there is no mention of his column (human interest? business? etc)
~~The major Margaret A. Edwards Award is explained generally without any specific citation of Cormier, not even the recognized body of work~~ Done
Refs to the given online sources are incomplete (as were the three Ext links that I have completed)

--P64 (talk) 02:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before leaving I covered the 1997 Phoenix Award adequately, and the 1991 Edwards Award with official citation and references --which is adequate content but slapped into two locations.

P.S. This "biography" says almost nothing about his life while he was a writer (spouse and children merely named in {{infobox writer}} fields), nor whether he ever retired, and nothing about his death (merely infobox fields).

--P64 (talk) 02:43, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genre(s)

I don't know Cormier and arrived only after covering the Phoenix Award at I am the cheese. Among other changes, I replaced {{infobox writer}} genre="Suspense, Young Adult" --which is appropriate for no one, but was invisible due to a syntax error-- thus:

Genre(s): Realist young adult (YA) novels, crime fiction, thriller

Because those are guesses I didn't add any genre portal to See also or genre category to the footer --such as Portal: Crime or Category:Crime fiction writers, or anything similar for mystery fiction, etc.

--P64 (talk) 02:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Robert Cormier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071210165839/http://www.ala.org:80/Template.cfm?Section=bbwlinks&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=85714 to http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=bbwlinks&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=85714

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Robert Cormier/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

all in all good... but it mentions nothing about multiple books of his being banned....

Last edited at 02:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robert Cormier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]