Talk:Robert Clive Jones

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

United States courts and judges

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Neutrality

My impression from reading this article is that Wikipedia thinks Robert Jones is a douchebag. (And he probably is, but Wikipedia needs to be neutral.)

"(without evidence)" should go. It's original research and one-sided. So is "According to Jones, that heterosexuals dislike same-sex couples being afforded the right to marry justifies depriving same-sex couples of marriage rights."

The paragraph about the letter on sequestration seems like a selected data point, and I'm not sure if it's really notable anyway. For example, the letter is not mentioned on Loretta A. Preska's page, and she was quoted in the Washington Post about it. ^[1]

It would be nice to have some more neutral or positive things that Jones has done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naptastic (talk • contribs) 23:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judges-urge-congress-to-avoid-more-sequestration-cuts/2013/08/15/64c4c30c-05f4-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html

Bot-created subpage

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Robert Clive Jones was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 02:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judges-urge-congress-to-avoid-more-sequestration-cuts/2013/08/15/64c4c30c-05f4-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html

[1]