Talk:Robert California

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by 68.165.77.51 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment:
Notability of this fictional character not established due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject
It was contested by 3:21:14:20: is key (talk · contribs)

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Television: The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by The Office task force.

Nominated for deletion

Since the proposed deletion was contested as documented above, I am following the WP:Articles for deletion process and nominating it for deletion. The reason remains the same: Notability of this fictional character is not established due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. 68.165.77.175 (talk) 06:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert California.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Robert California.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 15 February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Robert California.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scranton Strangler Section

Nothing but idle speculation without one reference to media which discusses it. Shouldn't it just be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.175.24.227 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Shore?

Why the heck does James Spader's "Robert California" character garner a bigger page than his Boston Legal alter-ego? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemmers (talk • contribs) 23:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Section Names - Seasons 7-8

Does this title make sense? Should it be split in to one section for each season? Admittedly, the section for Season 7 would be very short. Alternately, since he only stars in one season, should this section be given a title that shows that this covers the character's entire appearance on the show?

Omgouda (talk) 02:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lizard King?

This was one off-handed comment to Andy on a phone call. It’s just a Doors reference, not a true alter ego worth notating in the introductory paragraph. This should be removed, it’s just silly. Bob Kazamakis, though, might actually be his name (in the sentence preceding, he tells Andy, “you don’t even know my name,” so it’s plausible this is what he meant), so that should be kept. Deliusfan (talk) 06:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please tell the actors to portray Robert California as Gavin Newsome. Maybe he could be the new Governor named Gavin California? LOL. Thank you, W Manion, MDPhDJDMBA 2601:40:C400:A010:F9CB:2857:C496:DF45 (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]