Talk:Bob Smith (New Hampshire politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

United States: New Hampshire / Presidential elections Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Everglades Foundation

I removed the following paragraph:

Smith is currently the president of the Everglades Foundation. [1] While a U.S. senator as chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in 2000, Smith championed the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) through a GOP-led Senate.

The website http://evergladesfoundation.org/directors-staff.php does not list him anywhere.

Hitchens quote

The addition of the Hitchens quote in the first paragraph is clearly biased and does not belong at the very beginning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.186.27 (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Hitchens quote. It's funny and all but it's invective and abuse and doesn't belong. 216.135.32.188 (talk) 14:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Height

Does his height really belong in the opening? JBFrenchhorn (talk) 18:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC) He is pretty tall. It's kinda the first thing you notice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.67.41 (talk) 02:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You wouldn't notice it reading about him on the internet. I'll move it down.--Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry Endorsement

Here is an email response from Bob when I asked him about his endorsement of John Kerry (I found it odd since he is a Republican)

"2. John Kerry. Here is the very honest response to that issue. In my primary in 2002 President Bush and Karl Rove publicly promised that they would support my re-election against a moderate Republican, John Sununu. They broke their word and supported Sununu causing my defeat.

"I was angry with Bush and out of spite wrote a letter to Kerry endorsing him on a personal as opposed to a political level. Kerry released the letter to the press. In retrospect "endorsing" Kerry was a mistake. Of course I do not support John Kerry on anything. We fought on the POW issue, on abortion, guns, foreign policy, taxes, spending, you name it. I am human and I got mad. Bush let me down and I wanted to let him know how I felt. Any person who has followed my career knows that politcally Kerry and I were worlds apart. However trust and honor is important too and Bush violated that trust with me.

"When John Kerry was asked to come to NH to campaign against me, he refused. We had a good personal relationship and a terrible political one! At least he never lied to me and tried to defeat me.

"OK, I have said enough. By the way this all was written by me and not a staff member. I just wanted you to know this!"

I don't have all of the style and guidelines down for Wikipedia, but I will do my best to include this information, please check out my changes and edit as necessary. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.228.231 (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Omar Ahmad (American politician) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 September 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 06:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Smith (American politician) → Bob Smith (New Hampshire politician) – There are about a dozen other American politicians named Bob Smith or Robert Smith, and practically all people named Robert are often called Bob. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. There are various other same-named politicians, such as Robert Smith (Illinois politician) or Bob Smith (New Jersey state senator). The qualifier "(American politician)" was probably meant to be analogous to Bob Smith (Australian politician) or Robert Smith (Canadian politician) although, among Canadians, there are also Robert Smith (British Columbia politician), Robert Smith (Newfoundland politician) or Robert Smith (judge) who was also a politician. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Unlike some other open politician move discussions, this one shouldn't be controversial. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My preference here would be Bob Smith (U.S. senator). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 07:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- My suggestion was chosen in line with a comment by Necrothesp at Talk:Arthur Brown (Utah senator), saying that "[state] politician" is generally preferred on Wikipedia over something like "U.S. senator". Is that not the case? Also, Robert Barnwell Smith was also a U.S. senator (although he conducted some self-disambiguation during his lifetime). —BarrelProof (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.126.81.6 (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.