Talk:Robert Boulter/GA2
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment
Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made --Whiteguru (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Observations
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Reference 1 is primary, and cites two Wikipedia pages. Neither reference Robert Boulter.
- Reference 2 is a mention, not really a reliable source.
- Reference 3 goes to the Wikipedia page for the defunct Independent on Sunday
- Reference 4 goes to the Wikipedia page for The Herald (Glasgow)
- Reference 5 goes to the Wikipedia page for Evening Standard
- Reference 6 goes to the Wikipedia page for Judge John Deed
- Ditto Reference 7,8,9,10. All go to Wikipedia pages and not sources.
- Reference 11 is a dead link
- Reference 14 is a dead link
- References 15,16,17 all go to Wikipedia pages and not the source.
- Reference 22 is a 404, reference 23 goes to the Wikipedia page for Doctors.
- Reference 25 is likely a permanent dead link
- Reference 27 goes to the Wikipedia page for Daylight Robbery (2008 film)
- References 32, 33 go to the Wikipedia page for Waking the Dead.
- Ditto References 34,35
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- This article suffers from WP:PROSELINE - he starred in this, he performed that role here, this role there.
- There is no significant notability here except for a claim to fame as a (trial) stand-in for a young Luke Skywalker in The Force Awakens.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Given the number of links to roles played by this actor without proper references, this page appears to be WP:FANCRUFT
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Page created 11 October 2012
- 62 edits to this page by 36 editors in that time.
- Page achieved GA status on 13 July 2013
- Page creator is blocked for sockpuppetry, 26 November 2020
- There are no other significant editors except bots and page checkers.
- may need reassessment was added on 27 April 2021;
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Page is not illustrated with any images. It has tables of acting roles.
- Overall:
- There are a lot of problems with references on this page. Using Wikipedia as a source. WP:NOTSOURCE applies.
- Repair of sources will be needed to keep Good Article status. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Legitimate concerns raised above were not addressed. Should editors seek another reassessment, the issues raised above need to be addressed first before a reassessment can be commenced. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Delisted as Good Article