Talk:Robert Bloet/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Overall Summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive well-referenced article

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   No illustrations

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   No illustrations

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2009 (UTC)