Talk:Robert Baron (theologian)

Anglicanism High‑importance

	Robert Baron (theologian) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Requested move 29 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– No indication that the 17th century theologian's historical notability is at a level manifesting the necessity of retaining him as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Any time there's room for doubt, it's probably better to presume no one's primary. I would think the poet would be better known outside the circle of Christian theological studies, and has broader reader interest, though appears to have received less academic coverage. The professor is clearly not primary for this, though. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 08:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom - no clear primary topic. Paintspot Infez (talk) 21:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.