Talk:Robert Barefoot

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Barefoot redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This Article is Completely One-Sided, Has no "Neutrality" and is Essentially a Smear Piece

Every single point and citation only shows one side of the story. Using Wikipedia in this manner is disgraceful and is also a violation of Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living persons. 98.245.148.9 (talk) 18:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read our policies regarding neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability and reliable sourcing (RS). If you have RS that can add to the article, please provide them and show how you'd like to use them, starting here on the talk page. Maybe you can improve the article. Since mainstream sources (always RS) and alternative sources (rarely RS for medical matters) speak on the matter, the mainstream POV is given prominence per our fringe guidelines. Note also that any biomedical information or claims made on this article are covered by our medically reliable sources policy, IOW Barefoot's claims fail. -- Brangifer (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barefoot Vindicated on Claims About Multiple Schlerosis

Barefoot was hounded by the FDA and some members of the press about his claims regarding calcium, Vitamin D and how he claimed it could help MS (Multiple sclerosis).

Today he was vindicated by a major science study that confirms a strong connection between defective Vitamin D processing and people who have multiple sclerosis. It should also be noted that Vitamin D and the body's processing of calcium are intimately and tightly connected. These new findings should really be cited in this article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16086004

98.245.172.142 (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for the article about Kevin Trudeau.

98.245.172.142 (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And, as per the Kevin Trudeau article, since the BBC coverage doesn't mention Barefoot, it would by original research to add it to this article. Please don't. Sparthorse (talk) 20:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FDA and IRS Want to Throw Robert Barefoot in Jail For Making False Claims

In a very recent interview, Bob Barefoot claims he was forced to leave the U.S. and move to Costa Rica because the FDA and IRS are after him. According to Mr Barefoot they "want to put me in jail for telling people that they can cure themselves". Many people were wondering what happened to Bob Barefoot? All of a sudden (around the end of 2012) he literally seemed to fall off the face of the earth. I do wonder also about the integrity of the information presented on Wikipedia about Mr Barefoot. There are always two sides to every story folks! This recent interview with Robert Barefoot is very enlightening and I would recommend everyone read it before taking what is posted on Wikipedia about Mr Barefoot as gospel. Troysawyer (talk) 06:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC) http://www.life-saving-naturalcures-and-naturalremedies.com/bob-barefoot-interview.html[reply]