Talk:Robert Bacher/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 14:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First look - well written, couple of minor concerns;

Please DAB Luis Alvarez, and James Conant.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you confirm that in your writing style the citations at the end of a paragraph will cover all of the material therein?
- Yes. Each footnote covers the text back to the previous footnote, or the start of the paragraph, whichever comes first.
"As luck would have it" - tone seems slightly too informal for an encyclopædia, could you re-word it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilderien (talk • contribs) 20:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: Yes, very -

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: Well, (almost) all offline but seems reliable -

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: All images appear to be in the public domain -

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:

A very good article, and easily the fastest I have passed a GA.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]