Talk:Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 May 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

?

Why are the Talk and history pages not visible from this article. If it’s a protected page everyone should be able to see why

I have no idea what you're talking about. The History and Talk pages for this and every other article are readily available. QRep2020 (talk) 02:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does this page need to be semi-locked ?

Elon Musk, an influential businessman involved in litigation with this firm’s client just tweeted out this page url (https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1415585097177255936). Expect major editing activity which could prove detrimental to this page’s quality if not vetted through the talk page.

Second. QRep2020 (talk) 14:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded as well (by the way I edited your comment to include a link to Elon's Wiki page)

Performance section suspicions

All reference to firm's legal troubles, including William Lerach, have been removed by a single editor (presumably associated with the firm) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.182.61.172 (talk) 00:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Performance section as of today seems to be suspiciously similar in wording to this press release on Robbins Geller's site: http://www.rgrdlaw.com/news-item-SCAS-Top-50-Report-May-2016.html

Some of the sentences in Performance are almost-verbatim unquoted copies from that press release, e.g. "total amount recovered for investors and number of shareholder class action recoveries."

The section seems to have been introduced in its current form by this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robbins_Geller_Rudman_%26_Dowd_LLP&diff=prev&oldid=721631887

I'm going to tag the section with the Copy-paste template. If you came here because of that template, see above.

Gianttrombone (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]