Jump to content

Talk:Robbe De Hert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article not notable

[edit]

This article on Robbe De Hert fails to demonstrate significant coverage in reliable sources. According to Wikipedia's notability guidelines, a subject must have received significant coverage in multiple, independent, and reliable sources. However, the article on Robbe De Hert cites only a few sources, none of which are very notable themselves.

Secondly, Robbe De Hert's work is limited in scope, and his contributions to the film industry are not significant. While he may have made some contributions to Belgian cinema, it is difficult to argue that his work has had a notable impact on the industry globally. The article does not provide enough evidence to suggest that his work is significant enough to warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia like Wikipedia.

Thirdly, the article appears to be biased. A notable Wikipedia article should be objective and unbiased, presenting a balanced view of the subject. However, the article on Robbe De Hert appears to be promoting him as a filmmaker, rather than providing factual information about his work. This type of biased content goes against the core principles of Wikipedia and can damage the credibility of the platform.

In conclusion, while Robbe De Hert may have contributed to Belgian cinema, it is important to ensure that Wikipedia remains a platform for credible and verifiable information. As users, we have the power to maintain the platform's credibility by upholding the notability criteria and ensuring that only significant and reliable sources are used to create articles. By removing the article on Robbe De Hert, we can maintain the integrity of the platform and create a space where only noteworthy individuals are celebrated. Let's continue to use Wikipedia as a tool to inspire, educate, and inform users around the world with only the most notable and credible information. Alexandria Bucephalous (talk) 03:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]