Rob Kampia was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The lead is far to short; it should at least be a paragraph.
The article lack an infobox.
There is no birth date. At least a birth year would be required.
What in all of earth is a "501(c)(4)". This is not understandable by people outside the United States.
Stuff like "R-GA" is uncomprehendible for non-Americans. If you feel the need to state this, use [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] from Georgia.
Cities should be wikilinked. The format is "Concord, New Hampshire", not "Concord (New Hampshire)".
DEA needs to be de-abbreviated.
No not repeat wikilinks.
The "see also" section should not refer to links mentioned in the article, nor contain non-self explainatory links (such as NORML).
Almost all the references are incorrectly formatted. Use {{cite web}} and {{cite news}}, and at minimum include an author or publisher and the accessdate, in addition to title and URL. Dates should also be included if available.
Using MPP as a source is not totally prohibited, but on certain matters it is in violation with WP:RS. Using MPP (a non-independent source) for most of the article cannot be accepted. Statements like "Kampia has been quoted in almost every major newspaper in the U.S." are somewhat subjective (what is "almost" and "major newspaper" defined as) and needs to be attributed to an independent source.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article discusses very little about Kampia, and mostly redards his appearances in the media. For instance, I would like to see more than two sentences about his run for Congress. What was his main campaigning issues, did he receive many votes etc.
I am failing the article. It lacks the necessary scope to be a good article, as well as being incorrectly formattet (in particular the refences) and biased. If you feel there has been an error in the assessment, you can renominate the article, or ask for a reassessment. However, I strongly encourage that all issues be resolved bofore such action. The best of luck on further work. Arsenikk(talk)21:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 5 external links on Rob Kampia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.