Talk:Road House 2
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Unreadable
[edit]This article is unreadable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.122.8.2 (talk) 16:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- It reads just fine, as long as you are a drunken retard.74.191.67.11 (talk) 17:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 2 October 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Road House 2: Last Call → Road House 2 – The title of the film is Road House 2 not Road House 2: Last Call. The film's opening credits does use the title and the subtitle Last Call was never appeared — it instead appears to be an original research addition for some reason other than actual title accuracy. On more than one occasion now, an anonymous IP has gone around Wikipedia actively breaking links to this article by prematurely rewording them to the correct title despite the fact that it makes them redlinks, so I'm submitting this for discussion on their behalf since they likely don't know how to do it themselves — but if this is going to keep happening, then the title needs to be fixed. 115.133.88.144 (talk) 04:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. Some sites call it Road House, and some call it Road House 2: Last Call. I don't see a good reason to move it. Netflix calls it Road House 2: Last Call: link. It's clearly not original research. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nom gave good reasons, more below. Andrewa (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support per WP:SUBTITLE. The subtitle isn't necessary here.--Cúchullain t/c 15:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Lots of films use their subtitle: pretty much all the Star Wars and Star Trek films, Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan and quite a lot of other horror film sequels, Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, etc. I don't see why this should be any different. Yes, it's an "other stuff" argument, but those can be valid. It's not the end of the world if it gets moved, but I don't see a good reason to move a stable article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- The difference is, those subtitles are necessary for disambiguation, this one is not. Andrewa (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Lots of films use their subtitle: pretty much all the Star Wars and Star Trek films, Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan and quite a lot of other horror film sequels, Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, etc. I don't see why this should be any different. Yes, it's an "other stuff" argument, but those can be valid. It's not the end of the world if it gets moved, but I don't see a good reason to move a stable article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Target already redirects here. Current title is unnecessarily precise, a classic case of that in fact. Or to look at it another way, the shorter version must be the more common, because anyone who uses the longer one thereby also uses the shorter one, but not vice versa. Andrewa (talk) 05:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.