This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Both - this article and Roșia Montană Gold Corporation - have been written by the same author, whose only contributions are these two articles... As both articles only present a pro-mine viewpoint I assume that the author is connected to the project/company in question. noclador (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I read the article, it is clearly biased in the pro direction. It uses a tense which suggests certainty about the project's approval and does not feature any cons. Cristiklein (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And after the last series of edits, it is biased in the anti direction. The only way to clean this up is blow it up and start over again but the wise guys think it can be solved by normal editing. But normal editing still means remove 90% of the article with an editwar as result. The Bannertalk20:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
