Talk:Riverfront Park Carousel

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Eastern Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force.

1909 Looff Carrousel Correct Info

I recently updated the info on the Riverfront Park Carrousel's page in order to reflect current changes to the attraction. For one, the park spells carousel with two r's. I believe that this could be the old English spelling of carousel. Second, the ride does not use brass rings, it instead uses plastic rings. The last change is that the park calls it three seperate names: Riverfront Park Carrousel, Looff Carrousel and 1909 Looff Carrousel.

SoCalCoaster (talk) 08:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]