Talk:Riverdale High School (Quebec)

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal / Education Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Canada.

As I said in the edit summary, high schools are notable. I'd say adding a prod tag to it may be better in order to get people familiar with school articles involved. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how giving this one-liner another five days (it's had two weeks) is going to turn it into a worthwhile article, but I guess we'll see. android 79 02:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly think it's just that no one knows it's here. I'm sure a lot of people involved w/the schools stuff are watching prod, so... --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 02:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Mike Calce? Did he really go to Riverdale (Ive googled him, and I got something like this. But no Riverdale)? I go there, and I've never heard of him.

Fair use rationale for Image:RiverdaleHighSchoolLogo.jpg

Image:RiverdaleHighSchoolLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]