Jump to content

Talk:River Works station/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "to General Electric Aviation employees" isn't the company called "GE Aviation"?
    •  Done
  • "MassDOT, " expand before using this.
    •  Done
  • Lynn station is linked, but nothing for West Lynn?
    • Question? I'm not sure what you mean by this. Where?
  • "freight sidings" link?
    •  Done
  • "grade crossing" link?
    •  Done
  • "in 1837. By 1852" bit repetitive.
    •  Done Reworded.
  • You have several bold names, like G.E. Works but they don't all exist as redirects back to this article.
    •  Done Redirects created.
  • "Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn Railroad" it was "and" in the lead.
    •  Done
  • "railroad.[21][14]:77 " order.
    •  Done
  • "The River Works plant" overlinked.
    •  Done
  • "1952.[30][23][31]" order.
    •  Done
  • "timetables.[34][35][36][37] " likewise.
    • Those appear to already be in order.
  • "seven daily inbound boardings in 1983, and 27 in 2018" 7/27 or seven/twenty-seven.
    •  Done
  • Is that reference really page 0?
    • It's the inside front cover, what would be page 0 given the existing pagination. I can't think of a better way to indicate that with {{rp}}.
  • "schedules based on existing Saturday schedules were in effect from March 16 to June 23, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These schedules" schedules/schedules/schedules...
    •  Done Reworded.
  • "July 1, 2020–June 30, 2021" spaced en-dash.
    •  Done
  • "made accessible, with"
    • Question? Not sure what change you're suggesting here.
  • "with MassDOT in" again, spell it out.
    •  Done
  • Ref 46 could use an endash not a hyphen.
    •  Done

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the detailed review! I've addressed most of your comments, with clarification needed on a few. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at the ?'s and can't see any problems! Promoting. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]