Talk:Ritz Tower/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 20:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, this will clearly take some time, 148 references etc. pp. but I will do my very best to get it reviewed within a week from now. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: ✓ Pass
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: ✓ Pass
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: ✓ Pass
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: ✓ Pass
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: ✓ Pass
- C. It contains no original research: ✓ Pass
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: ✓ Pass
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: ✓ Pass
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: ✓ Pass
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): ✓ Pass
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: ✓ Pass
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: ✓ Pass
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: ✓ Pass
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: ✓ Pass
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: ✓ Pass
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: ✓ Pass
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: ✓ Pass
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: ✓ Pass
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: ✓ Pass
- Pass or Fail: ✓ Pass
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.